Angelina Jolie Responds After Brad Pitt Wins Court Ruling in Winery Dispute |


Angelina Jolie has vowed to 'beat the case' after Brad Pitt's court win in winery battle.
Angelina Jolie plans to file a lawsuit next year after Brad Pitt won a court case in their ongoing dispute over the sale of Château Miraval, with both sides remaining firm in their positions.

Angelina Jolie preparing for his upcoming trial Brad Pitt on the current sale of Château Miraval following a recent court decision in favor of the actor. The California Supreme Court accepted Pitt’s request to compel deposits from members of the business that acquired the winery, in a June 17 ruling.According to PEOPLE magazine, the decision represents another development in the long legal dispute between the former couple over the wine estate, which has become one of Hollywood’s biggest property disputes. A lawyer for Jolie responded to the court’s decision by stressing that his client is focused on the upcoming trial and his determination to resolve the matter.

Brad Pitt’s court success in the matter of deposits

Pitt’s legal team argued that executives of the company that bought Château Miraval had direct knowledge of Jolie’s 2021 sale of its value in the winery. The court ruled that these people had to make deposits even though they were outside the United States.In June 2025, Mr. Pitt tried to remove an executive from the company that bought the products, but court documents said the man refused to provide documents or go to an interview under the pretense of being a Swiss citizen. The decision which has just been made has overcome these objections, and it is determined that the money must be made in London by 30 September.

Brad Pitt wapeza chipambano chaposachedwa pamalamulo pamkangano wavinyo<br />” msid=”132028817″ width=”” title=”Brad Pitt’s legal team obtained a ruling allowing depositions from executives connected to the controversial sale of Château Miraval. Photo Credit (Instagram)” placeholdersrc=”https://static.toiimg.com/photo/83033472.cms” imgsize=”” resizemode=”4″ offsetvertical=”0″ placeholdermsid=”47529300″ type=”thumb” class=”” src=”https://static.toiimg.com/photo/msid-132028817/brad-pitt-scores-latest-legal-win-in-winery-disputebr.jpg” data-api-prerender=”true”/></p>
<p>Brad Pitt’s legal team obtained an injunction allowing depositions from executives linked to the controversial sale of Château Miraval. Image credit (Instagram)</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><h2>The larger story of Pitt’s claims</h2>
</p>
<p>Pitt filed a lawsuit against Jolie in 2023, seeking damages related to the sale of his stake in Château Miraval to the company’s wine division. In his legal filings, Mr Pitt said the sale involved a “spiritual partnership with Russia” and threatened the reputation that underpinned the business he founded. His legal team highlighted the abuses associated with the company’s Russian ownership and claims related to anti-LGBTQ laws.<span class=Pitt’s boss wanted him to fire a senior executive at the company. The business itself is run by a Russian billionaire who lives in Switzerland. New court documents indicate that “highly qualified individuals” from organizations involved in the regulatory process will also be required to testify in depositions.

The Court of Appeal has ruled in favor of the billionaire

On June 24, the California Court of Appeals ruled against the businessman who runs the company. An appeals court reversed part of an earlier ruling, finding it “beyond belief” that he could be at risk of $40 million in an action he did not take. A hearing to compel his dismissal is scheduled for July 8.

Angelina Jolie’s answer is legal action

Jolie’s attorney responded to the recent verdicts by downplaying their importance to the entire case. “These decisions are not affected by the case, and have no impact on Ms Jolie’s case,” her lawyer told the publication on June 25. “For now, Ms. Jolie is just hoping to beat the case next year so her family can focus on healing and moving forward.

Angelina Jolie akuyang'anabe mlandu womwe ukubwera<br />” msid=”132028835″ width=”” title=”Angelina Jolie’s legal team insists that the recent rulings have not affected the merits of her case ahead of next year’s trial. Image credit (Instagram)” placeholdersrc=”https://static.toiimg.com/photo/83033472.cms” imgsize=”” resizemode=”4″ offsetvertical=”0″ placeholdermsid=”47529300″ type=”thumb” class=”” src=”https://static.toiimg.com/photo/msid-132028835/angelina-jolie-remains-focused-on-upcoming-trialbr.jpg” data-api-prerender=”true”/></p>
<p>Angelina Jolie’s legal team insists that the recent rulings have not affected the merits of her case ahead of next year’s trial. Photo credit (Instagram)</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>In her legal filings, Jolie described what Pitt described as an “anti-immigrant, fake smokescreen.” His legal team maintained that his motivations for the sale were for business reasons and to benefit the family’s children, who inherited a portion of the Pitt estate.<span class=

Competitive issues in sales

A source close to Jolie gave her take on the commercial. “They didn’t sell the company for any other reason than they expected it to be a global distribution partner who could help grow the business for the benefit of their children, who stood to inherit Brad’s share,” he said.The same source also said that tensions in the business relationship are Pitt’s behavior. “The truth is that Pitt’s selfishness and desire for control got in the way. Brad refused to work with the company because Angie chose them, not him,” the source said.

Brad Pitt’s thoughts on the decision

Another source close to Pitt expressed the court’s decision differently, describing it as a step forward in understanding what happened. “The court victory is another way to show transparency about what happened,” an insider told the outlet. A source said that the businessman “is a partner that Jolie chose, knowing that he was a friend Brad did not want to be involved in the business.”According to the article, Jolie initially agreed that Pitt would have the “first right of refusal” before selling his price, but he continued the project without his consent. “The latest rulings mean that members of the company, possibly including the investor, must explain exactly how the deal went,” the source said.

The original argument is to dissolve the marriage

The legal dispute over Château Miraval began in February 2022, when Pitt filed a complaint that Jolie sold his share even though they had previously agreed to approve any deal. Jolie responded with a lawsuit in September 2022, saying that the actor “struggled with her” since they divorced in 2016 after two years of marriage.The couple, who share six children, agreed to divorce in December 2024 despite ongoing domestic disputes.



Source link

Post Comment

You May Have Missed