‘He kept saying I didn’t do anything wrong’: Ujjwal Nikam recalls Sanjay Dutt’s reaction to the verdict | Hindi Movie News
When the player Sanjay Dutt He was arrested for illegally taking weapons from the people of the world, some of the country’s top lawyers defended him in court. However, he was sent to prison, a decision that the prosecutor decided Ujjwal Nikam he is said to have come after strongly opposing any tolerance of the actor. Recalling the day the sentence was announced, Nikam said Sanjay was shaking with fear, as the media made the prosecutor look like a criminal for pushing for a harsher punishment.
Sanjay Dutt was “nervous by nature”, says Nikam
Speaking to Lallantop, Nikam said, “Whenever Sanjay Dutt cries, people blame me for it. The media can shape people’s opinion about someone. When the court gave its verdict against Sanjay Dutt, he was naturally scared. He was out on bail, but the court ordered his arrest.”
Nikam explains the contradictions and tolerance of Sanjay Dutt
Explaining what he did in court, Nikam said, “My argument was that Sanjay Dutt should not get the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act. He was convicted under the Arms Act, although the court acquitted him of criminal charges, and we did not argue against it. On bond I objected because the pistol he had was from the number one shooter.” Dawood Ibrahim. If he accepted a weapon from such a person, he was well aware of his criminal origins. The benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act is intended for first time offenders who are innocent but are incarcerated. That was not the case with Sanjay Dutt. “
Sanjay Dutt hired the best lawyers in the country
Nikam went on to recall that Sanjay had brought some of the country’s laws to represent him. He said: “He was dealing with the law enforcement officers of this country when I was a public prosecutor.
Sanjay Dutt was “trembling” after the verdict
Describing how Sanjay reacted after the verdict, Nikam said: “When the verdict was handed down, he was shaking, and he kept saying, ‘No sir, I have done nothing wrong sir, I will come back. He was shaking. I stood nearby and told him, ‘Sanju, the media is watching, please stand straight.’ Then I asked the police to take him. If I hadn’t encouraged him at the time, the media would have made me feel bad. Everyone opposed me.”
Sanjay Dutt is “not a terrorist”, explains Nikam
Although he pressed for a strict sentence, Nikam expressed that he never saw Sanjay Dutt as a terrorist. “I want to make it clear that Sanjay Dutt is not a terrorist. It was his childhood. You could see it in his eyes. He wanted to know about weapons, and at that time a lot of people were interested in the world.” Connecting with them seemed like a fluke,” he said.
Sanjay Dutt could have prevented the 1993 blasts, says Nikam
However, Nikam said that his real disappointment was that Sanjay could have helped in the 1993 Mumbai bombings. “When Abu Salem came with a car full of weapons, Sanjay Dutt kept some and returned the rest. My point is that if they had informed the police immediately, we would have prevented the bombings. Had the conspiracy been exposed, many lives would have been saved, and those involved would have been arrested. That was my complaint about him. But they were not terrorists.
Sanjay Dutt and Nikam share a close bond now
Despite their tussle in court, Nikam revealed that the two now share a good equation. “I met him after he was released. I have met him several times since then. He respects me. Once, I was at a hotel when he came to me and spoke to me. I have no hatred for anyone,” he said.
Post Comment